The first minutes of the terrorist attack in Kyiv: a policewoman explained why she did not open fire

Read also

The lobby of Pochayna is closed due to destruction

Lobby No. 2 of the Pochaina metro station is temporarily closed due to the consequences of the night shelling of the capital.

Night attack changed the route of bus No. 21

On the night of August 16, the capital was subjected to a night attack, which led to changes in public transport. In particular, the route of bus No. 21 will be temporarily changed.

Cultural Week in Kyiv: exhibitions, performances and holidays

A packed program of cultural and artistic events is planned for August 17-23 in the capital. A digest of events, including special events for Ukraine's Independence Day.

Kyiv social services update contacts of Kyiv residents with limited mobility

Kyiv is actively preparing for winter and possible unforeseen situations. One of the important steps is updating information about the capital's residents

Klitschko: Gostinny Dvor needs to be urgently transferred to Kyiv

Kyiv Mayor Vitaliy Klitschko appealed to the Prime Minister of Ukraine with a persistent request to transfer Gostinny Dvor to the ownership of the Kyiv community as soon as possible.

Share

The testimony of patrol officer Hanna Dudina adds new, emotionally difficult details to the overall picture of the tragedy. This is an important element, as it allows us to show the defense's position and explain the logic of the police's actions in the first minutes.

Here is a summary of the main points:

"I didn't see the shooter": Patrolwoman Dudina explained in court why she didn't open fire during the terrorist attack in Holosiiv

Patrol policewoman Hanna Dudina, who is accused of negligence after the shooting of people in the Holosiivskyi district, has given her first testimony in court. She does not admit her guilt and insists that she acted within the circumstances.

Main points of the testimony:

  • Why didn't they shoot? Dudina stated that she did not see the attacker himself, so she could not have opened fire “into nowhere.” According to her, shooting in the air in a densely populated area could have resulted in accidental casualties among residents of high-rise buildings.

  • The first minutes: The crew arrived at the scene in 4 minutes. The patrol saw two adults covered in blood and a 12-year-old boy with a head wound.

  • Saving a child: Dudina denies that she "ran away." She claims that she went to the car to get a first aid kit and call an ambulance, after which she hid the injured child in a nearby restaurant until the paramedics arrived.

  • Psychological state: The policewoman said that the child asked about her mother, but she did not dare to tell the truth, hoping that she would survive.

Chronology of events according to the protection version:

  • 16: 29: A call was received about hooliganism.

  • Arrival: The wounded were discovered near the entrance. The shooter was no longer visible at that point.

  • Shelling: When the patrolwoman moved 30 meters away for the first aid kit, more shots rang out, forcing her to seek cover.

Case context:

As a reminder, the State Bureau of Investigation charges the patrol officers with official negligence (Part 3, Article 367 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), which led to the deaths of people. The investigation believes that the law enforcement officers had the right to use weapons without warning, but left the scene, which allowed the terrorist to continue the killings and take hostages in the supermarket.